Review – A Chorus Line – revisited – London Palladium, 2nd June 2013

A Chorus LineA few months ago – on 23rd February to be precise – Mrs Chrisparkle and I went to see A Chorus Line at the Palladium. It was the first non-preview Saturday night. I loved it, as I knew I would, having loved it ever since as a slightly insecure 16 year old I sat, by myself, in Row C of the stalls at the Theatre Royal Drury Lane and became instantly captivated by this life-enhancing show that taught me so much about, well, everything really. £5.50 that ticket cost me; I must have saved up for weeks. One of the best investments I ever made.

Victoria Hamilton-BarrittAs I mentioned in my previous blog, I’ve kept the faith with this show basically all my life, seeing it not only in London, but also in Oxford, Sheffield and on Broadway. February’s trip was my 12th time of seeing it – and Mrs C’s 4th, bless her. She loves the show too – maybe not quite as fanatically as me. I guess we all have our own definition of “what I did for love”. Thanks to the kindness of a Third Party whom I shall not name – but if you’re reading this, thanks so much! – on Saturday we returned to see it again.

John PartridgeI’ve always been a “front stalls” man; that’s my default setting. But for this 13th viewing of A Chorus Line, we sat in the dress circle, and I’ve never seen the show from this angle before. It’s very impressive! It goes without saying that from the dress circle (Row B) you get a fantastic view of the entire stage. Even though you’re further back and you can’t see the sweat and the spit, there are other aspects of onstage activity that become more apparent. Specific elements of the dance; for example, Diana’s thumping tap moves, in an attempt to make some kind of noise with her sneakers, came across as really funny; and you could see that the accidental twist that results in an injury to one of the dancers was executed absolutely perfectly. The view also brought out the anxiety and buzz of the dancers mingling stage right, whilst they’re waiting for Larry to call them on to dance, or for Zach to choose them for his final seventeen. Absolute big up at this point to Georgie Ashford for a fabulous performance as Trisha during that first number. The resigned crestfallen looks from the dancers not chosen, somehow clearer from above, was something I had never really appreciated before.

Scarlett StrallenIf anything, the show is even better than three months ago. Everything flows so naturally and seamlessly. The voices are perfect, the dance moves stupendous. I’ve always loved Michael Bennett’s original choreography, it’s so eloquent yet subtle in comparison with Bob Fosse’s brash showmanship that most other people seemed to prefer at the time. Despite the fact that, as Cassie says, “they’re all special”, some roles are still seen as “starrier” than others and they’re all still sublimely performed. Victoria Hamilton-Barritt especially now really excels herself as Diana. She has taken the song “Nothing” and totally made it her own. With some quirky vocal expression and changes of pace she tells the story of that stupid course and the dreadful Mr Karp with such passion that we can see how that experience has strengthened Diana and shaped the way she copes with life’s problems today. Her “What I Did For Love” still hits home with its plaintive honesty and the whole cast’s backing singing is just superb – major goosebump time.

Leigh ZimmermannJohn Partridge continues to invest Zach with a humanity I’ve not seen in previous actors’ interpretations. His questioning technique of the dancers is rarely straightforward – at times he’s sly, provocative, humorous, compassionate, irate; and his questions in turn seem to elicit a more emotional response from the auditionee. His stage presence is just astounding, and he’s still loving that big number at the end. When Larry asks Sheila for her “I love to dance smile”, it’s Mr Partridge to whom they should look for inspiration.

Gary WatsonAs Cassie, I loved Scarlett Strallen’s heightened emotions when she and Zach are raking over the old coals of their former relationship; I’ve never heard a Cassie quite so outraged by Zach’s pig-headed selfishness. She’s got to keep on the right side of him because she wants the job, but there are some things she’s just not going to let him get away with! The two actors work together incredibly well in those scenes. And Leigh Zimmermann’s Sheila is still a brilliant portrayal of the slightly temperamental, definitely cynical, at heart vulnerable, brassy lady who knows there aren’t many years left that she can continue to be a chorus cutie. Her last look to Zach still speaks volumes.

Ed CurrieThe whole cast are superb, but I wanted to mention a few others that I didn’t talk about last time. There’s a terrifically solid and honest performance by Gary Watson as Don, who really brings his experience with Lola Latores and her twin forty-fours to life; it’s fun to imagine the two of them zooming off into the sunset in her pink Cadillac. I also loved the way he reacted to the final casting decision – absolutely right for that character. Ed Currie seems to have now really got to the heart of Bobby, “real weird” in that nerdy jumper, outrageously sending up the wackier aspects of his character but in an absolutely credible way. Frances Dee is a wonderfully out of tune Kristine, no pantomime character this but a real person who genuinely gets uptight through nerves; and Alastair Postlethwaite, who we thought would be destined for great things after seeing him in So You Think You Can Dance, is giving Larry a real character dimension; not just the assistant but someone who has to have a proper working relationship with Zach and with whom you sense he doesn’t always see eye-to-eye. Andy Rees is still a hugely entertaining Greg, and Harry Francis’ Mark – the character I always identified with when I was young – is a brilliant combination of youthful exuberance and awkward embarrassment. His dance skill is astonishing; you sense he could dance rings round the others given half a chance.

Andy ReesIn the performance we saw, the role of Paul, in many ways the most sympathetic and moving role in the show, was played by Michael Steedon. Paul has a stunningly written monologue to perform, and every Paul plays it slightly differently, obviously drawing on the actor’s own insights and experience. Mr Steedon is absolutely one of the best. Beautifully paced, sincere; I know that speech like the back of my hand and still it brought tears to my eyes.

Harry FrancisA funny thing happened halfway through the show – everything stopped! Judy had just confessed to kissing other girls as a rehearsal for when she wanted to start kissing guys when all the lights went out. Everything went silent; a little torch appeared at the sides of the stage and you heard the shuffle off of retreating dancers. Then, in a tone of immaculate calm, a disembodied voice announced that due to a technical issue they’d had to suspend the show and would get it going again as soon as possible. Well it’s not often that a number literally stops the show! I felt the lighting had gone awry in the “Mother” sequence beforehand; I don’t know if that was the cause. Anyway, for the first time, A Chorus Line actually had an interval! It was about ten minutes before they resumed the show, picking up precisely from where they had left off; and huge admiration to Andy Rees for getting straight back in with Greg’s “Hard” routine without a flicker of anything being wrong. That must have been quite nerve-racking.

Have to go back again soonOne other observation about this production of A Chorus Line is that I really like the fact that we now get an additional curtain call at the end. It was always a source of frustration to the teenage me that the last we saw of the performers was when the lights faded on the high kicks at the end of “One” – you never really felt you were given the opportunity fully to express your appreciation. Apart from the very last night in 1979, that is, when the lights went back up at the end of the show to reveal a stage and auditorium full of weeping cast and aficionados. Now, once the lights have faded, the dancers remain on stage one more time for a proper curtain call. Result: satisfaction all round.

Going back to see it again has satisfied me that the cast are still looking after the show wonderfully well – it’s all in very safe hands. Trouble is, now I’m going to have to go yet again. I knew I’d have to!

7 thoughts on “Review – A Chorus Line – revisited – London Palladium, 2nd June 2013

  1. I am definitely planning to go to the show! Actually especially because my hero John Partridge and his husband Jon Tsouras are in it! Ans after this fantastic review it certainly aroused mij interest. Hopefully see you soon

  2. Hi, just wanted to say sadly that it was one of the worse things I’ve seen. Hopelessly self indulgent to the point of tears – my husband and I wanted to walk out after the first 15 mins. of the show. I wish I knew he felt the same as we would have done. There is no interval. Kept waiting for something to happen – never came. There is literally nothing about this show I can possible say I liked. Go and see Top Hat, Burn the Floor, Singing in the Rain any of those type of dance productions if you really want value for money and a good all out Dance London Theatre production, but please don’t waste time or money on this one……sorry guys, but have to be totally honest!

    • Hi Rebecca, thanks for your comment. I don’t agree with you but I absolutely welcome your honesty! I do remember back in 1975 the review in Plays and Players magazine didn’t like it very much (Michael Coveney if I’m not mistaken) saying it was “just another slice of the American lie”, which I probably wasn’t quite old enough to understand fully. I am surprised that you didn’t find the opening number arresting – suddenly thrust into the audition environment; I’ve always found it very exciting. Personally I am too fond of the show from way back when to criticise it. But I’m sorry you didn’t enjoy it. I’ve not seen any of the productions you mentioned, although I did see Singing in the Rain at the Palladium in the 1980s (Tommy Steele version) and I remember liking it but thinking, it’s good, but it’s no Chorus Line! There you are, we’re all different!

      • Thanks for your reply….it’s just one of those things and maybe not my taste. I love a bit of razzmatazz. I knew where the show was coming from, but I was hugely disappointed as it was an evening out on our 20th wedding anniversary and we were just SO sorry it didn’t work for us. I recognised the acting skills, story line etc……but it was just American gush to us and don’t know how it will pan out long term. Only time will tell! Good luck anyway…I don’t want to be unkind for the sake of it, as you say we’re all different.

  3. I’m so glad I ran across your blog by coincidence, because “A Chorus Line” is one of my all-time favorite musicals too. And it is not every day that one comes across a real fan. Everyone says they are a fan of the show but only a few prove it and you sure know your ACL stuff! I love how it never fails, that when someone is passionate about this particular musical, they express themselves in a distinct manner, almost as if still in disbelief over what they had just seen for the first time or 20th time. I’ve seen it about 15 times myself, the last time being the final performance of the Equity U.S. national tour of the revival back in the summer of 2010 at the Pantages in Los Angeles. I was so thrilled to learn the national tour was closing in my city and got myself tickets to two performances. Just when I thought that the show couldn’t possibly be bettered, that final tour cast proved to me that anything is possible in the theatre! Such a powerful and nuanced group of actors and I didn’t even much like them the first time I saw them just a week before when I felt they had performed the roles in an overly cartoonish fashion. It’s as if they read my thoughts and performed the show just for me on that last night, lol! It was the polar opposite of the previous viewing and was a nice farewell to one of my favorite shows ever. I still like Les Miserables just a little bit better, but ACL isn’t too far behind.

    I also respect Rebecca’s views, even if I strongly disagree. She isn’t alone though, and although the vast majority of audiences do react positively to it, it’s not unheard of to know of audiences that totally hated it. In fact, I can be cognizant of others’ points of view to where I can actually see how they could not enjoy it, and to that, I can say that those who didn’t enjoy it share very common overall opinions of what they feel it was trying to achieve and it’s always perceived as being full of itself or whiney. I can see how it could be unlikable, but I’m personally glad that I was one of those who almost immediately became emotionally connected to all of those wonderful characters and was able to see the spectacle in that heart-stopping choreography so that it rivals some of the most spectacular moments from other shows but achieves it entirely within the context of the human drama unfolding before us, and in such an imaginative and provocatively abstract way! It’s like a dream, a surreal dream but then you find your eyes are open! Ahhh, I need my ACL fix now. LOL.

    • Hi Orcha and thanks for your comments – it’s not hard to realise that you too are a firm fan – or an “ACLoholic”, as the current hashtag would have it! I think it is the combination of the characters and the choreography that makes this show so special – as well as its overall vision of immense decency and humanity.

      Sadly, the show is to close early – the last night will be August 31st, although I understand they are still going ahead with a European and UK tour in 2014. We have already booked tickets for the last night as I am sure it will be a very special occasion, and I am also going again to a matinee this week – I don’t like to think of all these performances taking place just an hour’s train ride away and my not seeing them!

      You’ve got seven weeks to jump on a plane to London or else you’ll miss it!

      Best wishes

Leave a Reply